In article <44f6c3e4$0$94984$***@lon-reader.news.telstra.net>,
Ivan Kinda <***@concept-cdt.com> wrote:
> Karel Kriz wrote:
> > In article <44f601ef$0$94977$***@lon-reader.news.telstra.net>,
> > Ivan Kinda <***@concept-cdt.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Karel Kriz wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article <***@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>,
> >>> ***@razdva.cz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>http://www.lupa.cz/zpravicky/ross-hedvicek-kandiduje-do-spravni-rady-wikip
> >>>>ed
> >>>>ie
> >>>>/
> >>>>Ross Hedvicek kandiduje do správní rady Wikipedie
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>This is a good one! Hedvicek is not capable of arbitrating anything. The
> >>>concept of impartial judgment is totally alien to him.
> >>
> >>Are you sure you know what arbitration is? Let me demonstrate - I say
> >>that you should have 1/2 pound of arsenic in your next meal. Would a
> >>good arbitrator decide that it should be only 1/4 of a pound ? Or any
> >>other quantity ;-)
> >
> >
> > That is pig logic. A good arbitrator would determine that you are trying
> > to poison me.
>
> True, but when it comes to poisoning minds it is much harder to
> determine, isn't it ;-)
No, it's not. All it requires is independent thought.
>
> >
> >>>His area of
> >>>interest is miniscule: Post 1989 Communism in a tiny Central European
> >>>country, shit, that's almost as vertical as, say, animal husbandry in
> >>>the middle ages.
> >>
> >>Whereas the other guys there are veritable renaissance men, right ?
> >
> > I do not know them, but there is a good chance that their breadth of
> > knowledge and ability to be impartial exceeds Hedvicek's.
>
> Hmmm ... you don't know A, and you know B from some postings in this
> newsgroup, yet you know that A is better than B. Do you consider this to
> be a fact, reasonable opinion or just twaddle ?
A well formed opinion based on the available information. In other
words, rants that contain pearls such as:
"Koncentrace moji zloby??? Ja prece nejsem rozlobenej - ja bych je
akorat chtel videt vsechny viset a Cesko vybombardovano a srovnano se
zemi a vyasfaltovano a nadelany lajny a bylo by z toho krasny parkoviste
pro obchodni dum Skala v Budapesti. Zadna zloba ve mne neni. Rosta"
nebo
".Prave - muj nazor je ze Lidovky by mely byt slusnymi lidmi bojkotovany
a Ceska republika bombardovana letadly NATO...
Rosta P.S.: Cesko patri ven z NATO, za zeleznou oponu a Cesi zpatky za
ostnaty drat. Je to zver."
a
"S bombardovanim uz je to taky jinak - napred jsem navrhoval kobercove
bombardovani - po zkusenostech z Afganistanu je ale jasne, ze tzv.
surgical strikes taky dosahnou zadaneho cile. Ceska republika se prece
jen od Afganistanu tolik nelisi. Rosta"
There's plenty more...
....and you are defending this???
>
> > It does not
> > take much.
> >
> >>>But worst of all, he doesn't grasp the concept of
> >>>Wikipedia and has shown to be unable to abide by Wikipedia rules. Not
> >>>counting the fact that he's a congenital and persistent liar.
> >>
> >>... yep, that would do it. Please post details of his lies - so far I
> >>haven't seen any proof of that. A repeated allegation will not do,
> >>without a proof. So far the only information I gathered from your posts
> >>about Mr Hedvicek was information about you, and it wasn't pretty, sadly
> >>:-(
> >>
> >>
> >>>I expect
> >>>him to be booted out of Wikipedia faster then you can say "Communist
> >>>swine".
> >>>
> >>>K.
> >
> >
> > I have frequently proven that many of Hedviceks allegations are either
> > grossly exaggerated or patently untrue. Most recently it was his article
> > dealing with the number of Czech convicts in american prisons as his
> > statistics were easily checked. He has never responded in any meaningful
> > way beyond base insults and/or diversionary non-answers.
>
> Don't know about frequently - I haven't noticed one occasion yet. As for
> the one you are mentioning, I missed that, sorry (I am not here that
> much). Will look it up thought when I have some spare time.
As frequently as one can find time and inclination to wade through
Hedviceks's cesspool.
K
>
> >
> > K